In Adobe Media Encoder you can also set the Renderer at the lower-right corner of the Queue panel.There are now a lot of MacBook Pros to choose from and Apple’s falling out with NVidia together with the relative disappointment of FCPX has put a new spin on which machine to buy for video editing.The SSD is for OS X + software and the 500 GB spinning HD is for video since I use this to edit HD video H.265 filesAll I can say is that it made quite a difference after the switch from 13 inch. Set Renderer in Adobe Media Encoder. For Adobe Media Encoder, go to Preferences > General and set the Renderer to Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration (OpenCL/CUDA/Metal) under the Video Rendering section. Set Renderer in Adobe Premiere Pro.
Adobe Premiere Cs5 Choppy Playback Osx Ssd Windows 7 Has BeenAlthough I will compare PC performance in Premiere at the bottom of this article. The screens are second to none in terms of colour and contrast, they are like portable cinema displays, and the unibody construction is far superior to even the best built PC laptop, period.So I’m not swapping. Also I am often on the go so I much prefer editing video on a laptop than on a desktop workstation.OSX is still the best operating system out there whilst Windows 7 has been a great improvement over Vista but it still lacks the fluidity and focussed design ethic of a Mac. There are other benefits of a MacBook over a cheaper PC laptop which make the extra money justified. Now let’s be clear in terms of outright bang for buck, PC desktops (and laptops) offer far more speed but that has always been the case and the Mac platform has never been about bang, rather creativity. How a machine assists creativity can be measured it is just harder to gauge from the specs! For me creativity needs an unhindered workflow, a good display and an intuitive OS. Luckily, there are plenty of settings in Premiere Pro that can improve playback performance.However, even with a fast computer and GPU, sometimes what you have going on in your timeline is still too much to handle and you will notice stuttering video.Software wise Adobe Premiere Pro CS5.5 is king at the moment. Whether you're racing the clock or just starting out, ain't nobody got time for dropped frames.CUDA only accelerates timeline playback and so for time consuming things like encoding and overall system responsiveness (including multi-tasking with other apps like After Effects and Photoshop) the CPU is much more important, and I was effectivly getting a renderless timeline anyway with the fast CPU.4 cores result in double the performance over the 2010 dual core Intel i7. But I hate the way the pre-unibody chassis falls apart and the general unreliability of that system caused by faulty logic boards and a NVidia integration issue with their 8600 card.In the end I went for the latest 2011 17″ unibody MacBook Pro without CUDA but with a quad core i7 CPU, currently the best MacBook Pro available.I felt the extra investment was worth it. Is it worth the extra investment when you can get NVidia CUDA for almost half the price on a second hand dual core MacBook Pro?For many there’s also the much more reasonably priced option of a MacBook Pro from 2008 (pre-unibody) for under $1000 which has a Core 2 Duo 2.66Ghz processor that comes within 20% of matching the 2.53ghz dual core i5 of 2010.Personally if I was going for a PC it would be for cost reasons only, not outright performance.Currently the Premiere CS5/5.5 benchmark tells us which machines are the absolute kings for performance. I find that since Lion I am almost always running out of RAM so I have upped the default 4GB to 8GB – RAM is cheap these days so don’t hesitate!Now Lion is out so when OpenCL does become more widely supported in third party apps this laptop will really come into its own and so it is far more future proof than the 2010 NVidia MacBook Pros.What was important to me was not shaving a few seconds off a benchmark but having a good display in a laptop, good build and a good operating system together with enough performance.Others may have a different priority. Similar design huh?Whether you have a 2010 or 2011 unibody MacBook Pro I recommend at least 8GB of RAM otherwise the CPU is rather wasted. 3K RED footage is also handled well with keying for green screen work, all in real-time.The quad core Sandy Bridge logic board in the latest MacBook Pro is a beast.Above: iPhone 4S almost fits in the space occupied by the old 80’s Mac on the book cover of Steve’s biography. Playback is instantaneous and smooth with up to 6 video tracks, 2 or 3 filters and some colour grading on top of that, all in software without CUDA.Approximately 50-60 seconds to encode the benchmark’s H.264 sequence 6x SSD hard drives in RAID configuration!!Now that Xeon processor (and the SSDs) are hellishly expensive so what is the next best thing that gets close but is more cost effective? Here’s what the best Intel i7 desktop with standard hard drives is capable of: 12 core Xeon X5680 4Ghz (overclocked), 48GB RAM and NVidia GTX 580 graphics Approximately 40 seconds to encode the benchmark’s H.264 sequence Emails downloading but not showing inbox outlook for mac 2011I don’t so for me CUDA and a Quadro card is overkill.With Thunderbolt on the most recent MacBooks you will soon be able to edit on an external SSD for a nice performance boost. Playback with CUDA is also better but only if you are editing 96fps 5K or lots of FX and tracks. Approximately 90-120 seconds to encode the benchmark’s H.264 sequenceIncidentally the top ranking laptop above has the same processor as the 2011 MacBook Pro 17″ 2.2Ghz (my model – the 2720QM) but it scores higher due to a faster hard drive and more RAM. 4x 7200RPM hard drives in RAID configuration Just be sure to back it up with a lot of RAM.On a desktop PC choose NVidia over AMD for graphics if you have the choice regardless of how fast your CPU is, because CUDA is widely available even on less expensive cards, with upward of 768MB of video RAM.For me, a MacBook goes beyond the specs sheet and the extra expense is worth it for the overall experience. This is the approach that makes the 2011 MacBook Pros so attractive but if you can only afford a dual-core laptop (be it PC or Mac) go for one with NVidia CUDA especially if you are working with FX heavy projects.If your work isn’t FX heavy or you have a quad-core CPU you don’t need to concern yourself much with CUDA because timeline playback in Premiere Pro will be seamless anyway with no rendering required. Unlike in Final Cut Pro 7, Premiere Pro makes use of 64bit CPUs and that helps a lot.The CPU is general purpose so it benefits more apps and overall system performance. So for me, not really worth it though they are a bit cheaper.My first preference is to go for a CPU with at least 4 cores then you can pretty much forget about CUDA.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorKathy ArchivesCategories |